Macomber v. Cottrell
Michigan Supreme Court
Bill by Allen E. Maeomber against George Cottrell and others to set aside a compromise agreement and an assignment of a claim and for an accounting: On motion of complainant to amend the decree in the cause reported at page 91, ante.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The cause was heard on appeal from an order overruling demurrer to the bill. The order was reversed and the bill dismissed. The cause is reported ante, 91.
Counsel now ask us to amend the decree; fix a time *719within which complainant may amend his bill, and remand the cause for further proceedings. This application is upon two grounds. First, the statute, Act 299, Pub. Acts 1909. Second, the proposed statement of further facts set forth in the application now before us.
1. Statute. The practice in chancery requires an opportunity to amend bill or answer after demurrer sustained. Chancery Rule 9,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Shackelford v. BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Church v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Lamb v. JeffreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Aldine Manufacturing Co. v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Red Star Motor Drivers' Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Brandt v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1912