Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Converse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1891PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Grove, J.) Bill to reach assets in the hands of an alleged fraudulent holder. Defendants Converse and Fletcher appeal from decree overruling joint general demurrer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is a bill in the nature of a judgment. creditors’ bill to reach assets in the hands of an alleged fraudulent holder.

From the bill of complaint it appears that in December, 1886, three judgments, aggregating $2,300, were recovered in the Newaygo circuit court against the Newaygo Manufacturing Company; that executions were issued thereon, and were returned unsatisfied; that in March, 1890, these judgments were assigned to complainant.

It further appears that the Newaygo Manufacturing Company had been operated as a feeder to a railroad in which defendants Converse and Clay were largely…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. French v. ShotwellNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  3. Decker v. . DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Dickinson v. SeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Putnam v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Walker v. CasgrainMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Jones v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Torrent v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Long v. Tribune Printing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Pazdzierz v. First American Title Insurance (In Re Pazdzierz)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API