The Martin Lane Company, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Harry E. Wood with directions to prepare and file his opinion on the issues of plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment under the order of reference and Rule 166(c). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on June 4, 1970, wherein such facts as are necessary to the opinion are set forth. The plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to August 10, 1970 to file a request for review by the court of the commissioner’s opinion,…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Joseph H. Roberts v. The United States, Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- George W. Sturm, Doing Business as George W. Sturm Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Mason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- INSLAW, Inc. v. United States (In Re INSLAW, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Astro-Space Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.