INSLAW, Inc. v. United States (In Re INSLAW, Inc.)
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(Counts I, II and III of the Complaint)
GEORGE F. BASON, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
INTRODUCTION. 93
FINDINGS OF FACT. 93
I.THE NATURE OF INSLAW’S BUSINESS AND ITS DEVELOPMENT OF PROMIS. 93
A. Origins of INSLAW. 93
B. Formation of INSLAW as a “For-Profit” Corporation and the Development of its Proprietary Enhancements.-96
C. The Nature of the Proprietary Enhancements. 97
1. Data Base Adjustment. 98
2. Batch Update. 99
3. The 32-Bit Architecture VAX Version Of PROMIS. 99
4. Additional Discrete PROMIS Enhancements.100
II. INSLAW HAS CREATED USING…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In Re Edith Bloom, M.D., Debtor. William A. Goichman v. Edith Bloom, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor. Crysen/montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Fleet Mortgage Group, Inc. v. KanebCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- In Re Atlantic Business and Community CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Inslaw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.