Legal Opinion
Bellows-Claude Neon Co. v. Sun Ray Gas Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 26, 1929No. 2382PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of Claude patent 1,125,-476, dated January 19, 1915, calling for a system of illuminating by luminescent tubes, the effective date of the invention of which being November 28, 1910, when the corresponding French patent 434,525, was filed. Invalidity and noninfringement are interposed as defenses. Injunction and accounting are prayed for. Exceptional conditions requiring it, the ease was referred to a master for full hearing upon all issues. The matter is now before the court upon exceptions of both parties to the report of the master…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Penfield v. C. & A. Potts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- Petersime Incubator Co. v. Bundy Incubator Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.