Legal Opinion

Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1931No. 6221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit for infringement of letters patent No. 1,125,476, dated January 19, 1915, covering improvements in a system of illuminating by luminescent tubes. The plaintiff is the owner and holder of the exclusive right and license to manufacture, use, and sell the patented device,-or devices, in certain western states, including the state of Washington. A later patent set forth in the complaint is not involved on the present appeal. The court below found that the patent was invalid because the alleged invention was not useful, and because the description of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Electric Manuf'g Co. v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  4. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  5. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. American Neon Light CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. George A. Breon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Certain-Teed Products Corporation v. WallingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API