Legal Opinion
Petersime Incubator Co. v. Bundy Incubator Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 12, 1942No. 391PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
This is a suit under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, Section 274d Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, and under the patent laws of the United States. In the pleadings the question of the validity and claimed infringement of two patents is involved, to-wit: United States Letters Patent Nos. 1,911,249 and 1,911,250, both issued May 30, 1933, to Frank E. Stover and now owned by defendant, The Bundy Incubator Company. The two patents relate, the first to an apparatus and, the second to a method for the artificial incubation of eggs.
The original bill of complaint was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Petersime Incubator Co. v. Bundy Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943