Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
FREED, District Judge.
This is an action for the alleged infringement of plaintiff’s Patent No. 2,-322,041, relating to a combination automobile heater and windshield defroster. The alleged inventor of the device set forth in the patent is Edward L. Mayo, the president of the plaintiff-corporation. The plaintiff acquired the patent by assignment from Mayo prior to the date of issue. Plaintiff seeks an injunction and accounting.
The defendant challenges the patent-ability of the Mayo device on the grounds that it represents merely the product of mechanical skill as opposed to invention and that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Texas Co. v. Anderson-Prichard Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Timken Detroit Axle Co. v. Cleveland Steel Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Billy K. Watkins v. Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- City of Kingsport, Tennessee v. Steel and Roof Structure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- EW Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Bank of Heflin, Heflin, Alabama v. Landmark Inns of America, Inc., Etc., Charles W. LuedtkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Malta Manufacturing Company v. OstenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.