Legal Opinion

Canuso v. City of Niagara Falls

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 13, 1945No. Civil Action No. 1504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs to recover on a contract made by the plaintiffs with the defendant, City of Niagara Falls. Issue has been joined, and, among other things, the answer includes a counterclaim arising out of said contract, and to this counterclaim a reply has been interposed.

Heretofore orders have been made by this court, one directing the defendant to serve a bill of particulars, 3 F.R.D. 374, and the other directing the defendant to answer certain interrogatories, 4 F.R.D. 362. The bill of particulars was directed to amplifying the counterclaim,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
  2. Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
  3. Golato v. Gillespie, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API