Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 2, 2005No. Nos. 04-74C, 04-75CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER *

HEWITT, Judge.

The court has before it Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Request for Expedited Hearing (PL’s Mot. or Motion), Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery for Document Request 22 (PL’s Mem. or Memorandum), Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery (Def.’s Resp. or Response), and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Support of *324Motion to Compel Discovery for Document Request 22 (Def.’s Resp. Mem. or Responsive Memorandum).1

Plaintiffs Document Request 22 seeks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State of Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  3. Argo Marine Systems, Inc. v. Camar Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Lamoureux v. Genesis Pharmacy Services Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  5. United States ex rel. Fisher v. Network Software AssociatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lakeland Partners, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Trinos v. Quality Staffing Services Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API