Legal Opinion

Canuso v. City of Niagara Falls

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 9, 1945No. Civ. No. 1504PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This action is based upon a contract between plaintiff and defendant whereby plaintiff was to construct a sewage disposal plant for defendant for a stated consideration.

Plaintiff previously sought a bill of particulars, seeking a specification of the contract clauses under which defendant urges a claim to relief and further seeks itemizations of the general allegations of expenses and damages which alleged non-performance caused defendant to incur. This court, 3 F.R.D. 374, denied the motion for a bill of particulars in part and granted it in part and in passing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  2. Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  4. RCA Mfg. Co. v. Decca Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Kingsway Press v. Farrell Pub. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stonybrook Tenants Ass'n v. AlpertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  2. Porter v. Montaldo'sDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
  3. Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Hoffman v. Wilson Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Picking v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API