Legal Opinion
Canuso v. City of Niagara Falls
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1944No. Civ. No. 1504PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiffs for a bill of particulars addressed to nine counterclaims set forth in defendant’s amended answer.
The complaint alleges a contract reduced to writing and incorporated in a printed document with typewritten amendments, involving as the subject matter the construction of a sewage disposal plant for the City of Niagara Falls, New York, for the contract sum of over $1,700,000 and with a balance due and unpaid of $369,197.-88. The amended answer denies these allegations of the complaint which set forth the plaintiffs’ description of the printed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
- Brockway Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
- Thompson-Starret v. Chicago Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945