Legal Opinion

Canuso v. City of Niagara Falls

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 11, 1945No. Civil Action No. 1504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Defendant has now moved to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon the City Manager demanding the production of certain documents for examination before trial in connection with oral depositions being taken by plaintiff, or to impose terms. Defendant objects to the production upon the grounds that it would necessitate considerable time and expense to assemble the same, that the matter required is privileged and irrelevant, and that plaintiff should move under rule 34 rather than under rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Félix A. Thillet, Inc. v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966
  2. Carl Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API