Legal Opinion
Golato v. Gillespie
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Decided February 28, 1975No. 4044Published
1Opinion of the Court
SHIOMOS, J.,
The question before the court is whether plaintiff shall be allowed to make discovery of any surveillance conducted of him by defendant or anyone on his behalf. We today answer affirmatively that such discovery shall be allowed.
The following interrogatories were served by plaintiff upon defendant:
“1. State whether you, your attorney, or an agent(s) servant(s) employee(s), of either or both of yours, conducted any sound, photographic, motion picture film, personal sight or any other type of surveillance of the plaintiffs herein, or either of them.
“2. If so, state the name, address…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Snead v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Szarmack v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- MacKowain v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Goldberg v. Raleigh Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.