Legal Opinion

Golato v. Gillespie

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 28, 1975No. 4044Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHIOMOS, J.,

The question before the court is whether plaintiff shall be allowed to make discovery of any surveillance conducted of him by defendant or anyone on his behalf. We today answer affirmatively that such discovery shall be allowed.

The following interrogatories were served by plaintiff upon defendant:

“1. State whether you, your attorney, or an agent(s) servant(s) employee(s), of either or both of yours, conducted any sound, photographic, motion picture film, personal sight or any other type of surveillance of the plaintiffs herein, or either of them.
“2. If so, state the name, address…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Snead v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Szarmack v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. MacKowain v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Goldberg v. Raleigh Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API