Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. Crane
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
Preliminary statement:
For a clarification of the factual situation in this case, resulting considerably from the complex inter-relationship of the parties hereto under the legal doctrine of Principal and Agent, culminating in this litigation, it is necessary to understand, in limine, that there are just four parties involved in this litigation, namely: (1) Raymond M. Crane, an individual doing business as Associated Fruit Distributors of California, with a place of business in Los Angeles, California; (2) John C. Kazanjian, an individual doing business as Red…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nationwide Resources Corp. v. MassabniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Hessenthaler v. FarzinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Hillstrom v. GosnayMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.