Legal Opinion

Roehrs v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1932No. 28,599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by the obligee against the principal and his sureties on two appeal bonds. Special issues were submitted to a jury. Findings of fact and order for judgment in plaintiff’s favor followed. Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is sequel to a former suit, the subject matter of which was a Martin county farm. Plaintiff, claiming that defendant W. J. Thompson was wrongfully in possession, instituted in justice court an action of unlawful detainer and prevailed. It was appealed to the district court, tried' de novo, and again plaintiff prevailed.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Woodcock v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Bennett v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Skinner v. NeubauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Skog v. PomushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Crain v. BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API