Legal Opinion

Crain v. Baumgartner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1934No. 30,096PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. OLSEN, Justice.

The plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is one to recover the possession, or, in the alternative, the value, of 564 bushels of rye, of which plaintiffs allege they are the owners and entitled to possession. It is further alleged that this rye was raised on land owned by plaintiffs and tilled by one Halvorson as their tenant and that defendants removed the rye from the land and unlawfully detain the same. The defendant John Baumgartner, hereinafter referred to as defendant, answered separately. He alleges that he is the owner and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. O'DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Lindsay v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Woodcock v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Mulvihill v. FinsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API