Legal Opinion

Woodcock v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment on the pleadings, entered in the district court for Goodhue county, pursuant to an order of Mc-Cluer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

We think it was error to order judgment for defendant on the pleadings, although it is not surprising that the court below should have been somewhat confused by the mass of immaterial history, or, at best, mere evidence, by which counsel have extended the pleadings, in a simple action of trover and conversion, to the length of nearly 60 folios. The action is for damages for the wrongful taking and conversion of a number of sacks of grain, which the plaintiffs claim by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by one Puryea, in June, 1886, while the property was still a growing crop. The wrongful…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lane v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Samson v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Lindsay v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Jackson ex dem. Van Rensselaer v. HogeboomNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  5. Dayton v. VandoozerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Watkins v. DodsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. O'DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Kester v. AmonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Graceville State Bank v. HofschildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Golden Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. JohnstoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API