Legal Opinion

Roehrs v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1929No. 27,526PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action of unlawful detainer involving a 242-acre farm in Martin county and originating in justice court, where plaintiff had judgment of restitution. On defendant’s appeal to the district court, upon trial de novo without a jury, plaintiff again prevailed. The present appeal is by defendant from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

March 21, 1927, defendant conveyed the farm to plaintiff by warranty deed. Twenty-four days thereafter, April 14, plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract for the purchase of the land by defendant, who went into or remained in possession under that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Niggeler v. MaurinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. King v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Myrick v. CoursalleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Buse v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Marshall v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. O'Connor v. SchwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Nitkey v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Mayberry v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API