Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Neubauer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1956No. 36,739PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from judgment of the district court for defendants.

Plaintiff alleges that defendants’ taxicab was propelled in such a careless and negligent manner as to collide with him; that in the operation of the cab defendants faffed to keep a proper lookout for the safety of others; that the cab was driven at an excessive and unlawful rate of speed; that it was not under proper control and failed to yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian; and that, as a direct and proximate result of defendant’s negligence, plaintiff sustained injuries.

Defendants generally deny the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. SaporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Higgins v. L.A. Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faber v. RoelofsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Colby v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Krafft v. HirtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API