Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Nakai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1971No. 26588PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The action in which this proceeding was filed was authorized by P.L. 85-547, the Act of July 22, 1958, 72 Stat. 403. The purpose of the action, which was brought by the Hopi Indian Tribe against the Navajo Indian Tribe and the Attorney General on behalf of the United States, was to determine the rights and interests of the Hopi and Navajo Indian Tribes and individual Indians in a reservation in northeastern Arizona established by an Executive Order of December 16, 1882, and to quiet title to that reservation. A three-judge United States District Court held that, subject…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Miriam Morrison Peake v. The First National Bank and Trust Company of MarquetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Leonardo v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Wesch v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.