Legal Opinion
Settino v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 15, 1986No. 85C 6666PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Louis Settino (“Settino”), Robert Wesolowski (“Wesolowski”) and Carol Parker (“Parker”) originally sued the City of Chicago (“City”) and other defendants under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, 1 challenging City’s prohibition against persons over 35 years of age qualifying to become police officers. City moved alternatively for dismissal or summary judgment. 2 For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, this action is dismissed.
Facts
Two of the three original plaintiffs, Wesolowski and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- Marcia E. Stearns v. Consolidated Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- James F. Smith v. General Scanning, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- American Ass'n of People With Disabilities v. HoodDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- James SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL SCANNING, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Sullivan v. Faras-RLS Group, Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.