Sullivan v. Faras-RLS Group, Ltd.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT
CARROLL, District Judge.
I. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
A. Background
Plaintiffs brought this suit under the Miller Act to obtain payment for the labor and materials supplied in the construction of the United States Post Office building in San Carlos, Arizona. Plaintiffs claim that they expended work (labor and materials) valued at over $25,000.00, and that the prime contractor (of which defendant Mar-gante Faras is a partner or joint venturer) has refused to pay them for their work. Moreover, the bonding company that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Refrigeration Sales Co. v. Mitchell-Jackson, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- United States Ex Rel. Noland Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Refrigeration Sales Co., Inc. v. Mitchell-Jackson, Inc., a Corporation, and Alfred L. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Defenders of Wildlife v. BrownerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- 333 West Thomas Medical Building Enterprises v. SoetantyoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
- Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- United States ex rel. General Electric Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.