Legal Opinion

Schick v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1936No. Civ. 5525PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

In 1924 Joseph Schick became the insured under a policy issued by respondent, known as a “Yearly Decreasing Term Policy”. This policy was continuously kept in force by the payment of annual premiums except in 1931, when the policy lapsed, but was later reinstated. With respect to that lapse the evidence shows that in 1931 the insured told respondent that he would be unable to pay the total annual premium in one payment. He was informed by the company if a person were unable to make his yearly payment in one lump sum the same could be paid over a .period of six months by the payment of ten per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. California Southern Hotel Co. v. CallenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Methvin v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Cotton States Life Insurance v. LesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. California-Western States Life Insurance v. FeinstenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Merchants Fire Assurance Corporation v. Ann E. LattimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Page v. Washington Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wall v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Silva v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API