Legal Opinion

California Southern Hotel Co. v. Callender

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1892No. 14432PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The plaintiff is a California corporation, to whose capital stock the defendant subscribed five thousand dollars, before its organization, that being fifty shares of the one thousand shares into which the capital stock of one hundred thousand dollars was divided. After having paid two thousand dollars of this subscription, the defendant refused to pay any part of the remainder, and this action was brought to recover from him the remaining three thousand dollars. The cause was tried by the court, and judgment was given in favor of the plaintiff for the sum demanded. The defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Fishback v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Ehrlich v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Okey v. State InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. West v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Oakland Raiders v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Lackman v. SimpsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API