Legal Opinion

Wall v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1939No. Civ. 12147PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the superior court granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after judgment for the defendant.

The action is one at law, not in equity, for the recovery of damages for failure to pay death benefits upon a life policy— not one for the reformation of a contract. No contention is made by the plaintiff that the contract of insurance is ambiguous; in fact, she contended at the trial and again in the oral argument before this court that it is not ambiguous, and that none of the surrounding circumstances are admissible in evidence for the purpose…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Texas Company v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Bechtel v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Schick v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. George Herz & Co. v. SoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API