Legal Opinion

California-Western States Life Insurance v. Feinsten

California Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1940No. L. A. 16865PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal was taken from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in an action brought by the plaintiff insurance company to have canceled the disability provisions of an insurance policy issued to defendant Philip Feinstein. The other defendants are beneficiaries under the life provisions of the policy.

The facts as found to be true by the trial court appear as follows: That on or about the 28th day of October, 1925, the plaintiff’s predecessor issued a life insurance policy in favor of defendant Philip Feinstein; that a premium which was due the plaintiff company on October 28,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. McDanels v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lunardi v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Preston v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Williamson & Vollmer Engineering, Inc. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API