Legal Opinion

Cutler v. Haycock

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1907No. 1805PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal froml District Court, Sixth District; JnO'. F. Chidester, Judge. Replevin by IVIargaret R. Cutler against Thomas Haycock. From an order denying defendant’s application to vacate judgment by default for plaintiff and to set aside the default, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFeick, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against Haycock, tbe appellant, by default, and tbe matters presented for review arise out of tbe proceedings prior to judgment and those subsequent thereto on tbe application to set aside tbe default and to vacate tbe judgment. Tbe facts, briefly stated, are as follows: Tbe summons was duly served on the appellant at Panguitch, Garfield county, Utah, on November 11, 1905, in an action of replevin commenced by respondent against appellant in said court. A complaint and affidavit in replevin in due form were also filed on the same day. Tbe service and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Peterson v. CrosierUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Cameron v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Desimone v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cragin v. Henderson County Oil Development Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Orange Transp. Co. v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Johnson v. NolandIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hurd v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API