Legal Opinion

Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1953No. 7848PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Appellants seek to have the lower court’s refusal to vacate a default judgment taken against them by the respondent reversed on the grounds of excusable neglect.

The suit was one to quiet title. On May 26, 1951, appellant Arnold Dixon was served with process individually and as a director and trustee of the Dixon Ranch Company, a Utah corporation whose charter was suspended in 1934. He failed to answer or to notify the stockholders of the pending suit, and default was entered against him and the company on July 11th. Appellant Paul Dixon, one of about 20 stockholders, first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurd v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Peterson v. CrosierUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cutler v. HaycockUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Cooper v. DeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. McWhirter v. DonaldsonUtah Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Munster v. GroceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Lund v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Airkem Intermountain, Inc. v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Jones v. Layton/OklandUtah Supreme Court · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API