Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Ford

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1929No. 4737PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a default judgment rendered against her.

Plaintiffs brought the action to recover attorneys’ fees for legal services rendered and performed for defendant in a certain will contest in the district court of Salt Lake county and on appeal in the Supreme Court of the state of Utah of an alleged certain reasonable value. In view of the questions of practice raised on this appeal, it is necessary to set out the dates, all in the year 1928, when the various papers were filed and orders made.

Summons was served on defendant January 31st. Complaint was filed February…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Landwehr v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ZumwaltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Naderhoff v. Geo. Benz & SonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Plummer v. WeilWashington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Carman v. SlavensUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Butler v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Even Odds, Inc. v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Sovereen v. MeadowsUtah Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API