Legal Opinion
Desimone v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 2000No. 24971PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In Desimone v. State, 111 Nev. 1221, 904 P.2d 1 (1995) (Desimone /), this court held that appellant Corky Desimone’s criminal conviction of one count of possession of a trafficking quantity of a controlled substance constituted successive punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const. amend. V. The United States Supreme Court thereafter vacated our decision and remanded the matter to this court with instructions to reconsider in light of United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267 (1996). See Nevada v. Desimone, 518 U.S. 1030 (1996).
Ha…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Walcott v. WellsNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- Wimer v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Scorpion Silver Mining Co. v. MarsanoNevada Supreme Court · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.