Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Carroll

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1885No. 9748PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County setting aside a judgment by default. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment rendered in the absence of the plaintiff and his attorneys. The motion to set aside the judgment was made under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and was granted on condition that the plaintiff pay to the defendant the sum of $100 within ten days. The defendant excepted. The only question is, did the court abuse its discretion in making the order?

After reading the affidavits presented we cannot say that there was any abuse of discretion. The ease was at Sacramento, and the plaintiff’s attorneys resided at Red…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. McKinley v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Buell v. EmerichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cutler v. HaycockUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Westbrook v. RiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Chamberlin v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API