Legal Opinion
Ed Herman & Sons v. Russell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1995No. C7-93-609PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
Under Minn.Stat. § 582.31(a) (1994), a mortgagee of agricultural property may either obtain and execute a judgment for the debt owed on the note secured by the mortgage, or foreclose on the mortgage and obtain a deficiency judgment, if allowed. On March 23, 1990, Ed Herman & Sons, a Minnesota partnership, and Edward Herman, Gerald Herman and Duane Herman, three of its four partners, brought an action against James Russell and First Bank National Association, appellants, to have a $50,-000 mortgage against agricultural property owned by the partnership declared…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- National City Bank of Minneapolis v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Green v. BMW of North America, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re Improvement of Murray County Ditch No. 34Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.