Legal Opinion
State v. Zanelli
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided December 8, 1998No. 98-0733PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
Ronald Zanelli appeals from an order, following a jury trial, requiring his civil commitment as a sexually violent person under ch. 980, Stats. Zanelli raises four arguments^ in this, his second appeal. First, he claims that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a diagnosis of pedophilia because he did not meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders § 302.2 at 527-28 (4th ed. 1994) (DSM-IV). As a result, he asserts, his constitutional rights to notice and confrontation were violated. We reject these arguments…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Commitment of MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Commitment of LombardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LombardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Wisconsin v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.