Legal Opinion

In Re Commitment of Mark

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2006No. 2003AP2068PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. Charles W Mark (Mark) seeks review of a court of appeals' opinion1 affirming in part and reversing in part a circuit court decision to admit four statements Mark had made to his *7parole officer at his Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04)2 commitment hearing. Mark challenges the court of appeals' holding that only two of the four challenged statements should have been excluded pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution,3 because he claims that all four statements were both compelled and incriminating, as well as being testimonial. See State v. Zanelli…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. Ronald KnipferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Matthew W. Murphy v. Columbus McKinnon CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API