Legal Opinion

State v. Mark

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 3, 2005No. 03-2068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. Charles W. Mark appeals a judgment following a jury trial finding him to be a sexually violent person under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 1 and ordering his commitment. Mark contends the judgment and order should be reversed and the matter remanded for a new trial on two grounds.

¶ 2. First, Mark asserts that statements to his parole agent that were used against him at trial were compelled and therefore violated the constitutional rights accorded him under Wis. Stat. § 980.05(1m), 2 specifically, the Fifth Amendment right criminal defendants have not to be compelled to testify against themselves and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Commitment of MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. PeeblesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  4. In Re Commitment of MarkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  5. In Re Commitment of BuddCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API