State v. Mark
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
¶ 1. Charles W. Mark appeals a judgment following a jury trial finding him to be a sexually violent person under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 1 and ordering his commitment. Mark contends the judgment and order should be reversed and the matter remanded for a new trial on two grounds.
¶ 2. First, Mark asserts that statements to his parole agent that were used against him at trial were compelled and therefore violated the constitutional rights accorded him under Wis. Stat. § 980.05(1m), 2 specifically, the Fifth Amendment right criminal defendants have not to be compelled to testify against themselves and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Commitment of MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PeeblesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- In Re Commitment of MarkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- In Re Commitment of BuddCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.