State v. Lombard
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.
¶ 1. Joseph Lombard appeals a judgment that determined him to be a sexually violent person and committed him for treatment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1999-2000). He also appeals two orders denying his post-judgment motions. He claims error in the following: (1) the trial court's failure to give his requested instruction on "lack of volitional control"; (2) the unconstitutionality of 1999 Wis. Act 9 which removed the court's authority to grant immediate supervised release; (3) the trial court's instruction to the jury that sexually violent persons are eligible for supervised release; (4) the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MorfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Commitment of LombardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LombardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- In Re Commitment of LombardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.