Legal Opinion

State v. Lombard

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 31, 2003No. 00-3318PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

¶ 1. Joseph Lombard appeals a judgment that determined him to be a sexually violent person and committed him for treatment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1999-2000). He also appeals two orders denying his post-judgment motions. He claims error in the following: (1) the trial court's failure to give his requested instruction on "lack of volitional control"; (2) the unconstitutionality of 1999 Wis. Act 9 which removed the court's authority to grant immediate supervised release; (3) the trial court's instruction to the jury that sexually violent persons are eligible for supervised release; (4) the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MorfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Commitment of LombardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LombardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. In Re Commitment of LombardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API