Legal Opinion
In Re Commitment of Lombard
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 2004No. 00-3318PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*543N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.
¶ 1. Petitioner Joseph A. Lombard (Lombard) seeks review of a court of appeals' decision, State v. Lombard, 2003 WI App 163, 266 Wis. 2d 887, 669 N.W.2d 157, affirming a circuit court decision that rejected Lombard's contention that his Fifth Amendment1 rights were violated. The circuit court rejected Lombard's motion for a new trial, stating that the pre-petition interview process was sufficiently explained to him prior to his interview with the State evaluator. Lombard appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed.
¶ 2. We conclude that Lombard was not entitled to Miranda…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Olstad v. Microsoft CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Pierce v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Commitment of MarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State-Department of Corrections v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Hager (In Re Commitment of Hager)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.