Legal Opinion

Wright v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1923No. Civ. No. 4080PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Separate demurrers of the defendants, interposed to the complaint of the plaintiff, were sustained and the court refused leave to plaintiff to amend. The judgment of dismissal followed, from which plaintiff has taken his appeal.

Plaintiff alleged that on the twenty-sixth day of November, 1915, the Washington Motor Sales Company, a corporation, was by a judgment of the superior court of the state of Washington declared to be insolvent, and that an order was made appointing plaintiff as receiver and that he duly qualified and has ever since been acting as such. The averment next appears that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Lewis v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Iowa & California Land Co. v. HoagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Lackmann v. Supreme Council of Order of Chosen FriendsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Canfield v. ScrippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Smith v. SheplerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Muth v. Educators Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Dunphy v. McNamaraNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Luikart v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API