Legal Opinion

Dunphy v. McNamara

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1927No. 2757PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prohibition is allowed where appeal does not give adequate or speedy remedy. Fletcher v. Court, 51 Cal.App. 158. Supersedeas is allowed to stay execution where none is imposed by appeal or bond. Craig v. Stansbury,37 Cal.App. 671. Appellant should be protected by supersedeas whether or not statutes allow stay of proceedings. It issues when necessary to preserve status quo. S.P. Co. v. Court, 167 Cal. 252.

It is not against interest of petitioner or public policy to permit petitioner to manage property pending appeal. O'Donnell v. Court, 40 Nev. 438.

By stopping act of guardian of incompetent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Fox v. TayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rogers v. HatchNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Pacific Reclamation Co. v. DuckerNevada Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gottwals v. RencherNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Seaborn v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  4. American Sodium Co. v. ShelleyNevada Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API