Legal Opinion

Smith v. Shepler

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1935No. Civ. 5347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, J., pro tem.

Judgment was given in favor of plaintiff liquidator against defendant and appellant, a resident of Los Angeles County, California, for $3,739.08, based on his ownership of thirty shares of stock in First State Bank of Winter Haven, in Florida, of the par value of $3,000, interest at seven per cent being allowed on that sum from August 23, 1929, being the date on which the state comptroller of Florida made his order requiring all stockholders in the bank to pay the full amount of their alleged statutory liability, which could not exceed the par value of their shares.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Royal Trust Co. v. MacBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Williams v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McNeill v. PaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  4. Chavous v. GorntoSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. Wood v. HamaguchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clarkson Co. v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  2. Department of Banking v. HedgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Canfield v. ScrippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Luikart v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Hospelhorn v. DusenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API