Legal Opinion

Muth v. Educators Security Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1981No. Civ. 45675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

The instant appeal is from an “order discharging an attachment.” It is taken on a clerk’s and partial reporter’s transcripts of the pertinent proceedings and evidence of the superior court. We relate certain of the proceedings, and uncontroverted evidence, as found in those records.

On or about December 6, 1971, plaintiffs Paul L. Muth and Genevieve S. Muth, his wife, deeded to defendant Educators Security Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation, certain unimproved real property in Tehama County, California, which for reasons as will soon appear we shall refer to as…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. Plaisted & CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Matter of Estate of ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Title USA Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Quackenbush v. Armato, Gaims, Weil, West & EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API