Legal Opinion
Hicks v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 24, 2008No. 18050, 18056PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant state of Connecticut 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Herbert Hicks, for damages pursuant to General Statutes § 52-556, 2 which provides a right of action against the state for persons whose injuries are sustained “through the negligence of a state . . . employee when operating a motor vehicle owned and insured by the state . . . .” 3 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied its motion to set aside the verdict after the plaintiff failed to produce evidence to prove that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. MillanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. Michael H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.