Legal Opinion

Rimpa v. Erie Insurance Exchange

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1991No. 00873 and 00874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This action was instituted by the plaintiff seeking motor vehicle insurance benefits from the defendant insurer. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment prior to trial. After consideration, the trial judge denied the insurer’s motion for summary judgment and granted partial summary judgment to the plaintiff. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a petition for counsel fees, which was denied by the court. Thereafter, the defendant insurer appealed to our court, at No. 00873 Pittsburgh 1990, contending that the trial court erred in awarding summary judgment to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roach v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Geisler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Huber v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Lookenbill v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Omodio v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. RPM Pizza, Inc. v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Clarke, T. v. MMG Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Fulmer v. Com., Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. K & Lee Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Clarke, T. v. MMG Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API