Legal Opinion

Omodio v. Aetna Life & Casualty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1989No. 00430PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

The sole issue presented in this appeal by Aetna Life and Casualty (“Aetna”) is whether a provision in an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Aetna to appellee John Omodio which excludes from first party benefits coverage any bodily injury sustained by “any person ... as a direct result of loading or unloading any motor vehicle” is valid under the terms of sections 1711 and 1712 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (“the Financial Responsibility Law”), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1711, 1712, which direct insurers to make available for purchase first party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. O'BANNONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Roach v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Samilo v. PA. INSURANCE DEPT.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Persik v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dorohovich v. West American InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Danko v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. RPM Pizza, Inc. v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Clarke, T. v. MMG Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Huber v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API