Legal Opinion

Huber v. Erie Insurance Exchange

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1991No. 313PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee Erie Insurance Exchange’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Finding no error, we affirm.

Appellant, Tim Huber, submitted a claim to his insurer, Erie Insurance Exchange, seeking first party medical benefits under his automobile insurance policy. Huber’s injuries occurred when he was loading materials into his vehicle. Erie denied the claim, relying on a clause in the policy which excluded first party benefits when the person sustains injury while loading or unloading a motor vehicle, except while occupying the motor vehicle. Huber…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Alvarino v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Roach v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Dull v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Camacho v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dorohovich v. West American InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Danko v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lucas-Raso v. American Manufacturers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Timothy Rupert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Cummings v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API