Legal Opinion

K & Lee Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1789PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant improperly denied coverage under a fire and extended risk policy for contamination of plaintiff’s inventory caused by invisible ethyl acetate vapors. Plaintiff contends that because the policy insures against smoke damage, defendant has breached its contract and acted in bad faith by denying coverage. Defendant contends that the chemical vapors were not “smoke” within the meaning of the policy and has moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

In…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Childers v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance v. TrutanichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. C.J.H., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Allstate Insurance v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Brown v. American Motorists InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeBruickerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API