Geisler v. Motorists Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from the judgment resulting from the trial court’s orders denying appellant’s petition to correct, modify, or vacate the arbitrators’ award, and confirming the arbitration award. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in confirming the award because the arbitration panel committed errors of law in (1) allowing appellees to stack coverages under their insurance policy; and (2) improperly applying the “set off” provision of the policy. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the trial court and arbitrators properly allowed appellees to stack coverages, but…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v. Christian J. Pilosi James C. PilosiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Dorohovich v. West American InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Lambert v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Smith v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.