Legal Opinion
Fulmer v. Com., Pennsylvania State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 1994No. 283 M.D. 1992PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODGERS, Senior Judge.
James M. Fulmer (petitioner) has filed a petition for review in the nature of a complaint for a declaratory judgment requesting a ruling from this Court that the subrogation provision contained in Section 1720 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1720, precludes the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) from seeking reimbursement of benefits paid under the Heart and Lung Act. 1 Currently before us is petitioner’s motion for summary judgment.
Petitioner is a trooper with the PSP who sustained serious injuries as a passenger in a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Oliver v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- U.S. Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Stermel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hagans v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.