Legal Opinion
River Dock & Pile, Inc. v. O & G Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1991No. 14222PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether certain documents offered into evidence by the plaintiff were admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, as set forth in General Statutes § 52-180.1 The trial court concluded that the *789requirements of § 52-180 had been satisfied and admitted the documents. The named defendant seeks a new trial on the ground that the documents in question should not have been admitted.
The facts relevant to this appeal are largely undisputed. The named defendant, O and G Industries, Inc., was the general contractor for the renovation of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In re Kelly S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. Fitzwater.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- Calcano v. CalcanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.